Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bloodboiler's avatar

It behooves China to not back their currency with gold for the simple reason that their currency, and by extension their entire economy, will get manipulated like a yoyo by Jewry with the most gold holdings. We're talking about 125k+ tons of gold looted from China in the 1930s alone, not to mention all the booty plundered from many nations during their remote-control conquests such as of India, Russia, SE asia, middle east, etc. that by some conservative estimates amount to over 300k+ tons of gold that has been melted down and remolded to illuminate traceability.

Expand full comment
m droy's avatar

The conspiracy theory that there is not as much gold in Fort Knox as there is supposed to be has been around for quite a few years. Futures trade below the implied price of physical delivery for this reason. With increased geo-political tension and threats of a complete trade block between US and its small part of the world and the rest of world, this all seems perfectly natural.

Equally if I were an asian gold trader or investor, I would want to trade Shanghai delivery gold.

The problem for the RMB becoming the dominant reserve currency is the lack of assets - loans to high quality credits - China just doesn't need to borrow.

But for Gold trading, there is plenty of underlying asset.

So Gold trading naturally flows to where the money is, while reserve asset trading stays where teh borrowers are (for now)

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts