Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tach77's avatar

Hi Kevin,

I’d like to suggest that your posts on China’s aviation & in this case power turbines include additional factors to make them more comprehensive… & balanced…

Aviation:

1. Because C909 & C919 has many critical components gated by the west it’s a vulnerability that has hobbled China’s ability to ramp production. C919 was forecast for 75 units in March 2025 by Comac & in Sept revised down to less than 20. Only 5 have been delivered so far in 2025. This contrasts with Boeing & Airbus that regularly output 50+ units per month.

2. Certification & Insurance & Financing: . Regulatory bottlenecks have always been used as a weapon in the aviation business, and certifications are required to get insurance which is necessary for financing, as well as even allowing international Maintenance & landings etc… The EU flat out stated that they would delay & obstruct for many years… Let alone USA.

Power Turbines:

1. The new power turbines are F class turbines… Which the market has largely moved away from. The global trifecta is focused on H class or better turbines, which China is still dependent on imports. Google “China H class power Turbines”

2. This was from 2015… https://www.power-eng.com/gas/turbines/the-fall-of-the-f-class-turbine/

3. While F Class turbines are still widely used & appropriate or best in certain applications, China is really just getting started… Let’s put it this way… Siemens felt it was so outdated that it licensed the full technology for local manufacturing to… Iran. Iran now independently produces 150MW F class turbines that it recently exported to… Russia…

A big fan of your work!

Best,

-Nam

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?